This guide covers different ways to retrieve data from the database using Leoric. After reading this guide, you will know:
.include()
to reduce the number of database queries needed for data retrieval.Leoric provides two major ways to start a query, .find()
and .findOne()
. .findOne()
is basically the same as .find()
, except that it returns only one record or null if no record were found.
.findOne()
const post = await Post.findOne(1)
// => Post { id: 1, ... }
The SQL equivalent of the above is:
SELECT * FROM posts WHERE id = 1 LIMIT 1;
.findOne()
is like a stingy twin of .find()
because it works exactly like .find()
except that it will always append a .limit(1)
to it. Hence complex query is possible with .findOne()
too:
const post = await Post.findOne({
title: ['New Post', 'Untitled'],
createdAt: new Date(2012, 4, 15)
})
// => Post { id: 1, title: 'New Post', ... }
The SQL equivalent of the above is:
SELECT * FROM posts WHERE title IN ('New Post', 'Untitled') AND created_at = '2012-04-15 00:00:00' LIMIT 1;
If no record is found, .findOne()
will return null
whereas .find()
will return an empty collection.
.first
The .first
getter finds the first record ordered by primary key. For example:
const post = await Post.first
// => Post { id: 1, ... }
The SQL equivalent of the above is:
SELECT * FROM posts ORDER BY id LIMIT 1;
.last
The .last
getter finds the last record ordered by primary key. For example:
const post = await Post.last
// => Post { id: 42, ... }
The SQL equivalent of the above is:
SELECT * FROM posts ORDER BY id DESC LIMIT 1;
To retrieve multiple objects, just change from .findOne()
to .find()
. It takes the same parameters as .findOne
but will always return a collection. If no records were found, the collection will be empty. For example:
const posts = await Post.find({ id: [1, 10] })
// => Collection [ Post { id: 1, ... },
// Post { id: 10, ... } ]
The SQL equivalent of the above is:
SELECT * FROM posts WHERE id in (1, 10);
When we need to iterate over a large collection, the solution might seems straightforward:
const posts = await Post.all
for (const post of posts) {
// handle post
}
But if the posts table is at large size, this approach becomes slow and memory consuming, hence impractical. There are many ways to circumvent situations like this, such as refactor the implementation into smaller operations without loading all rows at once and so on. Switch to find in batch is the most convenient one:
for await (const post of Post.all.batch()) {
// handle post
}
The SQL equivalent of the above is:
-- assume posts contains 2000 rows, the default LIMIT is 1000
SELECT * FROM posts LIMIT 1000;
SELECT * FROM posts LIMIT 1000 OFFSET 1000;
SELECT * FROM posts LIMIT 1000 OFFSET 2000;
To set batch size, we can pass a number to .batch()
:
// This queries database with LIMIT 100
for await (const post of Post.all.batch(100)) {
// handle post
}
Both .find()
and .findOne()
allow you to specify conditions to filter records stored in database. Conditions can either be specified as:
For brevity and security concerns, we’d recommend using template string conditions.
Pure string conditions is quite handy if you need to query with literal values:
Post.find('title != "New Post"')
// => SELECT * FROM posts WHERE title != 'New Post';
But it can be dangerous too, if it is in clumsy hands:
Post.find(`title != ${title}`)
// let title be "'' or 1 = 1"
// => SELECT * FROM posts WHERE title != '' OR 1 = 1;
To prevent this SQL injection prone usage, Leoric will throw an error if complex values were found while parsing string conditions. The allowed values are:
'foo'
, "bar"
)true
/false
null
/undefined
For other type of values, consider object conditions or templated string conditions.
Object conditions may sound familiar because it’s a common approach of condition mapping in JavaScript, let alone in NoSQL databases like MongoDB. With object conditions, most of the simple conditions can be carried out by listing fields as keys and values as, well, values. The values can be extended as objects with $operator
s as key, hence make comparison conditions possible as well. Here are a few examples of object conditions with primitive values:
Post.find({ id: 1 })
// => SELECT * FROM posts WHERE id = 1;
Post.find({ title: 'New Post' })
// => SELECT * FROM posts WHERE title = 'New Post';
Post.find({ title: undefined })
Post.find({ title: null })
// => SELECT * FROM posts WHERE title IS NULL;
and with values of array or other non-primitive types:
Post.find({ title: ['New Post', 'Untitled'] })
// => SELECT * FROM posts WHERE title IN ('New Post', 'Untitled');
Post.find({
title: { toSqlString: () => "'New Post'" }
})
// toSqlString() will be called when it comes to objects with toSqlString() method.
// => SELECT * FROM posts WHERE title = 'New Post';
As you may have noticed in the previous example, the values in object conditions can be objects as well. If every property of the object is one of ($eq, $gt, $gte, $lt, $lte, $ne, $in, $nin, $notIn, $like, $notLike, $between, $notBetween)
, the object is considered operator object condition:
Post.find({ title: { $ne: 'New Post' } })
// => SELECT * FROM posts WHERE title != 'New Post';
Post.find({ title: { $like: '%Post%' } })
// => SELECT * FROM posts WHERE title LIKE '%Post%';
Post.find({ createdAt: { $lt: new Date(2017, 10, 11) } })
// => SELECT * FROM posts WHERE gmt_create < '2017-11-11 00:00:00';
Post.find({ createdAt: { $notBetween: [new Date(2017, 10, 11), new Date(2017, 11, 12)] } })
// => SELECT * FROM posts WHERE gmt_create NOT BETWEEN '2017-11-11 00:00:00' AND '2017-12-12 00:00:00';
If the object has multiple operators, the condition is combined with AND
:
Post.find({ id: { $gt: 0, $lt: 999999 }})
// => SELECT * FROM posts WHERE id >= 0 AND id <= 999999
Currently no logical operators (such as AND
, OR
, and !
) is supported via operator object condition. Consider using string conditions instead.
Templated string conditions usually are the better option against object conditions when it comes to multiple conditions or comparison conditions for its brevity. The example of object conditions above can be written in templated string conditions as this:
Post.find('title != ?', 'New Post')
// => SELECT * FROM posts WHERE title != 'New Post';
Post.find('title like ?', '%Post%')
// => SELECT * FROM posts WHERE title LIKE '%Post%';
Post.find('createdAt < ?', new Date(2017, 10, 11))
// => SELECT * FROM posts WHERE gmt_create < '2017-11-11 00:00:00'
Post.find('createdAt < ? or createdAt > ?', new Date(2017, 10, 11), new Date(2017, 11, 12))
// => SELECT * FROM posts WHERE gmt_create < '2017-11-11 00:00:00'
Templated string conditions works with special primitive values or non-primitive values too:
Post.find('title = ?', null)
Post.find('title = ?', undefined)
// => SELECT * FROM posts WHERE title IS NULL;
Post.find('title = ?', ['New Post', 'Untitled'])
// => SELECT * FROM posts WHERE title in ('New Post', 'Untitled');
When it comes to combining multiple conditions, templated string conditions is at its best advantage:
Post.find('title != ? and createdAt > ?', 'New Post', new Date(2017, 10, 11))
// => SELECT * FROM posts WHERE title != 'New Post' AND gmt_create > '2017-10-11';
To retrieve the records from the database in specific order, you can use the order method.
For example, to retrieve posts updated most recently, we can order the posts by updatedAt
in descending order:
Post.order('updatedAt', 'desc')
.order()
also accepts parameters in following types:
Post.order('updatedAt desc')
Post.order({ updatedAt: 'desc' })
The SQL equivalent of the above is:
SELECT * FROM posts ORDER BY updated_at DESC;
The order is default to asc
. Hence Post.order('updatedAt')
is the same as Post.order('updatedAt asc')
.
To order by multiple columns:
Post.order({ updatedAt: 'desc', title: 'asc' })
// or
Post.order('updatedAt desc').order('title')
Both are equivalent to the following SQL:
SELECT * FROM posts ORDER BY updated_at DESC, title ASC;
By default, .find()
selects all the fields from the result set using *
. To select a subset of fields from the result set, you can specify the subset with the .select()
method:
Post.select('id', 'title', 'createdAt')
// or
Post.select('id, title, createdAt')
The SQL equivalent of the above is:
SELECT id, title, created_at FROM posts;
It is always recommended to limit the query, unless the query result is unlikely to be bloated. One of the scenarios where limit and offset are used most often, is pagination. For example, to get the top 20 posts updated most recently:
const posts = await Post.order('updatedAt desc').limit(20)
To get the second 20 posts updated most recent, e.g. user turned to page 2 and the page size is 20:
const posts = await Post.order('updatedAt desc').limit(20).offset(20)
The SQL equivalent of the above is:
SELECT * FROM posts ORDER BY updated_at DESC LIMIT 20 OFFSET 20;
GROUP BY
is one of most important features of relational database. Combined with calculation functions such as COUNT()
and SUM()
, it is a convenient way of accumulating meaningful data from records.
For example, if you want to find out at which date most posts where published:
Post.group('DATE(createdAt)').count().order('count desc')
The SQL equivalent of the above is:
SELECT COUNT(*) as count, DATE(created_at) FROM posts GROUP BY DATE(created_at) ORDER BY count DESC;
When the query is grouped, it returns vanilla query results of the database instead of dispatching the results to the corresponding models because there’s none. The example above might return:
[ { count: 1, 'DATE(created_at)': '2017-12-12' },
{ count: 5, 'DATE(created_at)': '2017-11-11' },
... ]
It is still possible to join other models to the query though, we’ll discuss that in the Joining Tables section.
HAVING
is only necessary when you need to filter the results by calculated columns. It is recommended to put the conditions into WHERE
as much as possible and leave only the calculated ones to HAVING
because in this way the temporary data set would be smaller.
Take the group example above for another example, we can rule out dates that has the count of posts published less than 5.
Post.group('DATE(createdAt)').count().order('count desc').having('count < 5')
The SQL equivalent of the above is:
SELECT COUNT(*) as count, DATE(created_at) FROM posts GROUP BY DATE(created_at) HAVING count < 5 ORDER BY count DESC;
And the results might be:
[ { count: 4, 'DATE(created_at)': '2017-11-11' },
... ]
The transaction ability is a bit premature currently due to the lack of
LOCK
. Hopefully we’ll see to it soon.
We can use Model.transaction()
to obtain a connection from the connection pool, and wrap the queries between BEGIN
and COMMIT
/ROLLBACK
through the obtained connection. Model.transaction()
takes either AsyncFunction
or GeneratorFunction
as argument. Take following transaction for example:
Post.transaction(async function({ connection }) {
await Comment.create({ content: 'tl;dr', articleId: 1 }, { connection });
await Post.findOne({ id: 1 }).increment('commentCount', { connection });
});
the equivalent generator function version is like below:
Post.transaction(function* () {
yield Comment.create({ content: 'tl;dr', articleId: 1 });
yield Post.findOne({ id: 1 }).increment('commentCount');
});
// => Promise
The SQL equivalent of the above is:
BEGIN
INSERT INTO comments (content, article_id) VALUES ('tl;dr', 1);
UPDATE posts SET comment_count = comment_count + 1 WHERE id = 1;
COMMIT
If there were any exceptions thrown during iteration, Model.transaction()
forwards the exception after executing ROLLBACK
.
The use of function* () {}
might be a bit absurd at first glance. Behind the curtain,
BEGIN
generator.next()
to push the iterator forward.generator.next()
returns an instance of Spell
, the obtained connection is set to spell.connection
.COMMIT
In this way we make sure all the related SQLs are queried through the same connection.
Leoric provides two ways of constructing JOIN querys:
.with(relationName)
,.join(Model, onConditions)
.Predefined associations can be found by examining Model.relations
, which is generated by calling Model.describe()
implicitly. We can define associations by arranging .hasMany()
, .hasOne()
, and .belongsTo()
in Model.describe()
such as:
class Post extends Bone {
static initialize() {
this.hasMany('comments')
this.belongsTo('author', { foreignKey: 'authorId', Model: 'User' })
}
}
To find with predefined joins, we call .include(name)
:
Post.include('comments')
// or
Post.find().with('comments')
The SQL equivalent of the above is:
SELECT * FROM posts LEFT JOIN comments ON posts.id = comments.post_id;
A LEFT JOIN is performed to preserve posts that have got no comments. The ON conditional expression is generated according to the type and the settings of the association. See Associations for detailed informations.
To find multiple predefined joins, we can either pass multiple association names to .include()
or chain them one by one using .with()
:
Post.include('comments', 'author')
// or
Post.find().with('comments').with('author')
Please be noted that the chaining order of .with()
matters, queries like below are not equivalent:
Post.findOne().with('comments')
// NOT EQUALS TO
Post.find().with('comments').first
By type definitions, both queries will return a Post instance or null depending on the record can be found or not. But the generated SQLs are quite different:
SELECT * FROM (SELECT * FROM posts LIMIT 1) AS posts LEFT JOIN comments ON comments.post_id = posts.id
-- NOT EQUALS TO
SELECT * FROM posts AS posts LEFT JOIN comments ON comments.post_id = posts.id LIMIT 1
The major difference is the place of LIMIT
, the former query will fetch the first post and all of its associated comments, the latter query however, will only return the first post and its first comment.
We can keep on chaining the query methods if comments need to be limited as well:
Post.findOne().with('comments').limit(10)
which is equivalent of SQL below:
SELECT * FROM (SELECT * FROM posts LIMIT 1) AS posts LEFT JOIN comments ON comments.post_id = posts.id LIMIT 10
If a join is needed but not predefined in Model.describe()
, it can still be accomplished with .join()
:
Post
.join(Comment, 'posts.id = comments.postId')
.join(User, 'posts.authorId = users.id')
The SQL equivalent of the above is:
SELECT * FROM posts LEFT JOIN comments ON posts.id = comments.post_id LEFT JOIN users ON posts.author_id = users.id;
Like predefined joins, LEFT JOIN is preferred to preserve left table in the final results.
The table aliases were transformed by pluralize(camelCase(Model.name))
. In the example above, here are the transformed table aliases:
Model Name | Table Alias |
---|---|
Post | posts |
Comment | comments |
User | users |
We can reference these table aliases futher after the join, such as .where()
or .order()
:
Post.join(Comment, 'posts.id = comments.postId').where('comments.id = 1')
Post.join(Comment, 'posts.id = comments.postId').where({ 'comments.id': 1 })
If the model has deletedAt
attribute, it won’t be actually deleted when calling Model.remove()
but will be updated by setting deletedAt
to the time when Model.remove()
is called. This behavior is called soft delete.
To make soft delete transparent to model consumers, a default WHERE condition is added every time before a query generates the final SQL. For example, if Post
model has deletedAt
attribute, the SQL equivalent of Post.find()
would be:
SELECT * FROM posts WHERE deleted_at IS NULL;
But if any WHERE
conditional expressions have got deletedAt
referenced already, the default .where({ deletedAt: null })
won’t be appended. For example, the SQL equivalent of Post.find('deletedAt != null')
is:
SELECT * FROM posts WHERE deleted_at IS NOT NULL;
Leoric implemented this behavior as scopes, which is a concept (among many others) stolen from Active Record. Currently this conditional .where({ deletedAt: null })
is the only default scope.
To truly go scope free, we can get the unscoped version of the query by accessing the unscoped
attribute:
Post.find({ id: [1, 10] }).unscoped
Regardless of whether Post
has got a deletedAt
attribute or not, the SQL equivalent of the above is:
SELECT * FROM posts WHERE id IN (1, 10)
Leoric supports Method Chaining, which allows methods be appended consecutively to complete the query. It is implemented by returning an instance of Spell
when a query method of the model, such as .find()
and .order()
, is called.
Post.find() // => Spell { Model: Post }
The spell provides methods such as .where()
, .order()
, .group()
, .having()
, limit()
, and .join()
. Most of them returns an instance of Spell
, hence making method chaining possible. When the methods were called, the SQL isn’t generated right away. We can get the final SQL manually by calling .toSqlString()
. To get the query results, we can treat spells as promises. For example:
// ES5 style
const spell = Post.find()
spell
.then(posts => { ... })
.catch(err => console.error(err.stacak))
// ES6 with co
co(function* () {
const posts = yield Post.find()
})
// ES2016 style
async function() {
const posts = await Post.find()
}
Since Leoric is written in ES2016, which is supported by Node.js LTS already, we’d encourage you to start using async/await too.
Anyway, you can always append further query details onto the spell until it’s done, even if there’s asynchronous jobs in between:
const query = Post.where('title LIKE ?', '%Post%')
const posts = await query.order('updatedAt desc').limit(10)
const [{ count }] = await query.count() // unordered and unlimited count
this.body = { posts, count }
It’s common that you need to find a record or create it if it doesn’t exist. Hence our source of inspiration, Active Record, provides a specific find_or_create_by
method. It’s trivial to implement but can get confused with upsert
behaviour a lot.
In MongoDB there’s
db.collection.update({ upsert: true })
, in PostgreSQL there’sINSERT ... ON CONFLICT ... DO UPDATE
, and in MySQL (and forks such as MariaDB) there’sINSERT ... ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE
. In general, if duplicated values of primary key were found, the record gets updated. If not, the record gets inserted.
Leoric takes this upsert
behavior to update on duplicated keys. For example:
const post = new Post({ id: 1, title: 'New Post' })
await post.save()
If Post { id: 1 }
exists, its title
gets updated to New Post
.
But this upsert
thing is NOT exactly the same as the meaning of Find or Build a New Object. For example, if our users were distinguished by email, we can find the user by email, or create a new one if not found:
let user = await User.findOne({ email: 'john@example.com' })
if (!user) user = await User.create({ email: 'john@example.com' })
To make a long story short, if the value of the primary key is known, feel free to use model.save()
because it’s taken care of with upsert
. If not, we’ll need to find or build a new object by hand.
All calculation methods work directly on a model:
const results = await Post.count()
Or on a query:
const results = await Post.where('name like ?', '%Post%').count()
If you want to count the total numbers of records in your model’s table you could call Model.count()
. If you need to be more specific, say to find how many items does the shop have got, you can:
Shop.find(1).with('items').count('items.*')
The SQL equivalent of the above is:
SELECT COUNT(items.*) AS count FROM (SELECT * FROM shops WHERE id = 1) AS shops LEFT JOIN items ON items.shop_id = shops.id;
If you want to see the average of certain number in your model’s table, you could call Model.average()
. Say to find the average age of your website’s subscribed users, you can:
User.where({ subscribed: true }).average('age')
The SQL equivalent of the above is:
SELECT AVG(age) FROM users WHERE subscribed = 1;
If you want to see the minimum of certain number in your model’s table, you could call Model.minimum()
. Say to find the minimum age of your website’s subscribed users, you can:
User.minimum('age')
The SQL equivalent of the above is:
SELECT MIN(age) AS minimum FROM users;
If you want to see the maximum of certain number in your model’s table, you could call Model.maximum()
. Say to find the maximum age of your website’s subscribed users, you can:
User.maximum('age')
The SQL equivalent of the above is:
SELECT MAX(age) AS maximum FROM users;
If you want to find the sum of a field for all records in your model’s table you could call Model.sum()
. Say to find the total price of the items of certain shop, you can:
Shop.find(42).with('items').sum('items.price')
The SQL equivalent of the above is:
SELECT SUM(items.price) FROM (SELECT * FROM shops WHERE id = 42) AS shops LEFT JOIN items ON items.shop_id = shops.id;